A senior official involved with robodebt admits the unlawful welfare recovery scheme was underpinned by "flawed assumptions".
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
or signup to continue reading
Elizabeth Bundy, who ran the Human Services department's internal reviews for welfare payments in 2017, appeared at the robodebt royal commission in Brisbane on Tuesday.
Ms Bundy agreed using the controversial practice of income averaging to calculate Centrelink debts could result in inaccurate figures.
But within the department, there was a view that tax office data could be relied upon when employers could not be contacted.
Angus Scott, counsel assisting the royal commission, challenged Ms Bundy on the basis for department decisions.
"Whether or not it was top of your mind, you surely knew in 2017 ... whether or not there is a basis for an administrative decision was lawful was if there was evidence to support it," he said.
"The answer, Ms Bundy, is there was no evidence was there?"
Ms Bundy admitted "in hindsight ... it was a flawed assumption".
The public servant was quizzed on her department's decision not to appeal any Administrative Appeals Tribunal decisions, which wiped robodebts on the basis the notices lacked supporting evidence.
She agreed the department would have had to appeal those decisions if it disagreed.
The commission was shown an email sent by Ms Bundy's colleague, which said they would be concerned if Human Services didn't appeal a "zero-debt" decision.
"If they don't it will open up Pandora's box," the colleague said.
Terry Carney, who worked at the administrative tribunal for almost 40 years, repeatedly ruled the robodebts could not be legally enforced.
He found it was not the responsibility of welfare recipients to provide pay-slip data or risk being hit with a debt.
He found the practice of averaging income lacked "sufficient strength of evidence" and "simple mathematics".
"From the very early stages I read the budget papers and saw what was proposed, all sorts of alarm bells went off in my mind," Mr Carney said.
"The legal foundation was completely missing."
Mr Carney said it was common throughout his lengthy tenure that the Department of Human Services "rapidly appealed" decisions where a major government policy was at stake.
But the department never appealed any ruling that found a robodebt was not legally enforceable.
The same year he repeatedly ruled against robodebt, Mr Carney reapplied for his position but was not reappointed.
"It did come as a surprise," he said.
The robodebt program was eventually abolished in 2019.
Australian Associated Press
